StoreRadar vs Winning Hunter
Compared because they are in the same category. Values come from details confirmed on each vendor's own site. Unknown means the site does not say.
| StoreRadar | Winning Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Store databases | Store databases |
| What it is | Describe an offer and get a matched CSV, not a database to search. | Ad spy platform whose store explorer filters 5M+ stores by installed app. |
| Price | $99 one-time for 500 stores, then $299 or $699 a month | $49 / $79 / $249 a month, 15% off quarterly, 40% off yearly |
| Pricing tiers | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Free plan | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Trial | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Stores covered | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Platforms | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Install history | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Contacts included | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Export | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| CRM integrations | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Integrations | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Ownership | Independent, as far as its site says | Independent, as far as its site says |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launched | Unknown | Unknown |
The caveats
StoreRadar. You get less coverage in return for the convenience: 400,000 storefronts, against Store Leads' 3 million Shopify records and StoreInspect's 1.4 million. The app detection on show is a handful of large apps, Klaviyo, Yotpo, Judge.me, Loox and Recharge, where Store Leads tracks 8,127 apps with install dates. So this category's main question, which stores run my competitor, can be answered here only if your competitor is big enough to be fingerprinted. You also cannot look before you buy: there is no searchable account, delivery is a CSV by email, the API is still on the roadmap, and the $99 sample is the trial. Nobody is named anywhere. The revenue bands are a catalog-based estimate calibrated on licensed Similarweb traffic, not observed figures, and their own footnote admits this. The Independent profiles row on the homepage links to Capterra, LaunchFree, TheSaaSDir and three more listing sites, which are submissions, not assessments. The founding rate locked for ten seats shows the pricing is not settled yet.
Winning Hunter. The store side is what you would pay for, and it is the least documented part. The app filter is a substring match on app names. There is no published count of apps it recognizes, or of how often a store is rescanned. The revenue figures are estimates with no method attached. Everything else is priced for ad research you will not use. The 500k+ users and 5M+ stores are its own figures. There is a free trial that takes no card. So the app filter can be tested against a competitor whose installs you already know before paying.
How Winning Hunter differs from StoreRadar
Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from StoreRadar is stated.
How StoreRadar differs from Winning Hunter
Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from Winning Hunter is stated.
Alternatives to StoreRadar · Alternatives to Winning Hunter
To compare up to four tools at once, pick them with Compare in the directory. Sites: storeradar.co, winninghunter.com.