StoreInspect vs StoreRadar

The caveats

StoreInspect. Nobody is named. There is no company, no founder and no location, and a support address is the whole contact page. That is a lot of trust to give a vendor selling you 1.4 million merchants' contact details. Treat the contact side as your own compliance question. The site says the data is public. That is not the same as saying an outreach campaign built on it is lawful where you or the merchant are. The store counts are self-reported, and the refresh cadence is described as regular without a number. So how current any single record is cannot be checked from outside.

StoreRadar. You get less coverage in return for the convenience: 400,000 storefronts, against Store Leads' 3 million Shopify records and StoreInspect's 1.4 million. The app detection on show is a handful of large apps, Klaviyo, Yotpo, Judge.me, Loox and Recharge, where Store Leads tracks 8,127 apps with install dates. So this category's main question, which stores run my competitor, can be answered here only if your competitor is big enough to be fingerprinted. You also cannot look before you buy: there is no searchable account, delivery is a CSV by email, the API is still on the roadmap, and the $99 sample is the trial. Nobody is named anywhere. The revenue bands are a catalog-based estimate calibrated on licensed Similarweb traffic, not observed figures, and their own footnote admits this. The Independent profiles row on the homepage links to Capterra, LaunchFree, TheSaaSDir and three more listing sites, which are submissions, not assessments. The founding rate locked for ten seats shows the pricing is not settled yet.

How StoreRadar differs from StoreInspect

Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from StoreInspect is stated.

How StoreInspect differs from StoreRadar

Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from StoreRadar is stated.