etailinsights vs StoreRadar

The caveats

etailinsights. Nothing about the price is published. There is no pricing page, and both calls to action are a demo request or a trial signup. The terms put the figure on an order form and add 3% to card payments. That looks like an annual contract, not a card and a login. Coverage is the bigger question: 750 technologies is platform and stack level. Nothing on the public site shows detection of individual Shopify apps. So it is not shown to answer the question this category exists for: which stores run my competitor. It is worth listing only as a contact database for retail brands, some of which happen to be on Shopify.

StoreRadar. You get less coverage in return for the convenience: 400,000 storefronts, against Store Leads' 3 million Shopify records and StoreInspect's 1.4 million. The app detection on show is a handful of large apps, Klaviyo, Yotpo, Judge.me, Loox and Recharge, where Store Leads tracks 8,127 apps with install dates. So this category's main question, which stores run my competitor, can be answered here only if your competitor is big enough to be fingerprinted. You also cannot look before you buy: there is no searchable account, delivery is a CSV by email, the API is still on the roadmap, and the $99 sample is the trial. Nobody is named anywhere. The revenue bands are a catalog-based estimate calibrated on licensed Similarweb traffic, not observed figures, and their own footnote admits this. The Independent profiles row on the homepage links to Capterra, LaunchFree, TheSaaSDir and three more listing sites, which are submissions, not assessments. The founding rate locked for ten seats shows the pricing is not settled yet.

How StoreRadar differs from etailinsights

Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from etailinsights is stated.

How etailinsights differs from StoreRadar

Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from StoreRadar is stated.