EcomAudience vs Winning Hunter
Compared because they are in the same category. Values come from details confirmed on each vendor's own site. Unknown means the site does not say.
| EcomAudience | Winning Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Store databases | Store databases |
| What it is | Pay per opted-in merchant email, collected when someone joins an ecommerce newsletter. | Ad spy platform whose store explorer filters 5M+ stores by installed app. |
| Price | $4 per opt-in, $100 minimum top-up | $49 / $79 / $249 a month, 15% off quarterly, 40% off yearly |
| Pricing tiers | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Free plan | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Trial | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Stores covered | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Platforms | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Install history | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Contacts included | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Export | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| CRM integrations | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Integrations | Not confirmed yet | Not confirmed yet |
| Ownership | by Idube Pte. Ltd. (Claus Lauter, Ecommerce Coffee Break) | Independent, as far as its site says |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launched | Unknown | Unknown |
The caveats
EcomAudience. Not a Shopify audience. The audience is one newsletter's new signups: Amazon sellers, DTC founders and general online business owners alongside Shopify merchants. The platform is only known when the subscriber volunteers it. So you pay the same $4 for someone who will never install an app. Volume is capped by that newsletter's growth: 1,500 to 2,000 new subscribers a month by its own count, partly from paid acquisition. The cost per customer and LTV figures on the pricing page are its own illustrations. The opt-in is one click on a post-signup page, and what happens after it is outside anything they track.
Winning Hunter. The store side is what you would pay for, and it is the least documented part. The app filter is a substring match on app names. There is no published count of apps it recognizes, or of how often a store is rescanned. The revenue figures are estimates with no method attached. Everything else is priced for ad research you will not use. The 500k+ users and 5M+ stores are its own figures. There is a free trial that takes no card. So the app filter can be tested against a competitor whose installs you already know before paying.
How Winning Hunter differs from EcomAudience
Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from EcomAudience is stated.
How EcomAudience differs from Winning Hunter
Details for one of these are not confirmed yet, so no difference from Winning Hunter is stated.
Alternatives to EcomAudience · Alternatives to Winning Hunter
To compare up to four tools at once, pick them with Compare in the directory. Sites: ecomaudience.com, winninghunter.com.